Wikidata:Property proposal/skyscanner hotel ID
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
skyscanner hotel ID[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Organization
| Description | skyscanner hotel ID |
|---|---|
| Data type | External identifier |
| Example 1 | d'primahotel Petitenget Seminyak (Q110903311) → 134620184 |
| Example 2 | Melia Bali Villas & Spa (Q110774995) → 131947552 |
| Example 3 | Kempinski Hotel Corvinus, Budapest (Q1106716) → 46980258 |
| Formatter URL | https://www.skyscanner.co.id/hotels/_/_/_/ht-$1 |
Motivation[edit]
(Add your motivation for this property here.) Germartin1 (talk) 06:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Leaning oppose Since Skyscanner is only an aggregator, there are no hotels that can't be identified with other IDs like Booking.com hotel ID (P3607) or TripAdvisor ID (P3134). I don't see much value in adding every hotel platform of the world, when there's no special inventory or dataset. --Newt713 (talk) 14:30, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Newt713: I do have a dataset, and the advantage of Skyscanner is that it links to Agoda, Booking and Trip.com, which can be added automatically. Germartin1 (talk) 15:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- But is there an added value, when it can be added automatically? Does it help to identify an organization/hotel or to be used as a reference? --Newt713 (talk) 16:34, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Newt713: Yes it will be used to help identify hotels and I also want to use it as a reference. Germartin1 (talk) 02:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Newt713: any other question? Germartin1 (talk) 09:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- No, thank you. I still don't see a need for those aggregated IDs, but if you need it to work with it, I would not oppose. Best --Newt713 (talk) 09:40, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks, the prop would still help me for querying, matching and as a reference. Germartin1 (talk) 12:01, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- No, thank you. I still don't see a need for those aggregated IDs, but if you need it to work with it, I would not oppose. Best --Newt713 (talk) 09:40, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Newt713: any other question? Germartin1 (talk) 09:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Newt713: Yes it will be used to help identify hotels and I also want to use it as a reference. Germartin1 (talk) 02:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- But is there an added value, when it can be added automatically? Does it help to identify an organization/hotel or to be used as a reference? --Newt713 (talk) 16:34, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Newt713: I do have a dataset, and the advantage of Skyscanner is that it links to Agoda, Booking and Trip.com, which can be added automatically. Germartin1 (talk) 15:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Orlandata (talk) 11:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)- Support Nepalicoi (talk) 08:21, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support—MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 06:37, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Germartin1, Orlandata, Nepalicoi, MasterRus21thCentury:
Done: Skyscanner hotel ID (P10487). Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 17:56, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
