Wikidata:Property proposal/Washington Rare Plant Field Guide ID

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Washington Rare Plant Field Guide ID

[edit]

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Natural science

Descriptionidentifier for a rare plant in the Washington Natural Heritage Program's Rare Plant Field Guide
RepresentsOnline Field Guide to the Rare Plants of Washington (Q106146327)
Data typeExternal identifier
Domaintaxon (Q16521)
Allowed values[a-z0-9]+
Example 1Ammannia robusta (Q4747164)amro3
Example 2Lycopodiella inundata (Q899476)lyin2
Example 3Oxytropis borealis var. viscida (Q32365334)oxbov
Example 4Poa nervosa (Q10807800)pone2
Example 5Rubus arcticus subsp. acaulis (Q24689109)ruara2
Example 6Utricularia gibba (Q244015)utrgib
Sourcehttps://www.dnr.wa.gov/NHPfieldguide
Planned usewill add to items as they are edited
Number of IDs in source341 vascular plants, 16 mosses and one lichen (as of March 23, 2021; see https://www.dnr.wa.gov/NHPfieldguide)
Expected completenesseventually complete (Q21873974)
Formatter URLhttps://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/amp_nh_$1.pdf
See alsoCNPS ID (P4194)
Applicable "stated in"-valueOnline Field Guide to the Rare Plants of Washington (Q106146327)

Motivation

[edit]

The Washington Natural Heritage Program (Q106146523)'s Online Field Guide to the Rare Plants of Washington (Q106146327) includes descriptions of 341 vascular plants, 16 mosses, and one lichen. Each treatment includes information on identification, phenology, range, habitat, ecology, state status, inventory needs, threats, and references. Species and habitat photos, line drawings and distribution maps are also included. This property will provide a link to authoritative information on the rare plants of Washington State. UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 23:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
M.A.Miron Vincnet41 Tubezlob Prime Lemur Tris T7 TT me Infomuse TED Wkee4ager Haymillefolium Bluerasberry (talk)

Notified participants of WikiProject Botany.

Thierry Caro Fuzheado

Notified participants of WikiProject United States.

✓ Done @UWashPrincipalCataloger, Thierry Caro, Succu, Clements.UWLib, Jala360: While I do understand Succu’s point of view, various external identifier propsals with far fewer values than this have been approved. No modeling, scope or technical concerns were raised. So I don’t think that the opposing vote doesn’t mean that there is no consensus in principle. --Emu (talk) 19:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]