Wikidata:Property proposal/Sogou Baike ID
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sogou Baike ID[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Not done
| Description | identifier of Sogou Baike wiki |
|---|---|
| Data type | External identifier |
| Domain | item |
| Allowed values | [1-9][0-9]{0-9} |
| Example 1 | Yang Mi (Q1137458) → 98080 |
| Example 2 | Wang Xiqin (Q28416743) → 73298812 |
| Example 3 | Bill Gates (Q5284) → 4399653 |
| Example 4 | United States of America (Q30) → 48184 |
| Source | https://baike.sogou.com/ |
| External links | Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt]. |
| Planned use | Sogou Baike has tens of millions entities, which can further supplement Wikidata |
| Number of IDs in source | 10,000,000 |
| Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) |
| Formatter URL | https://baike.sogou.com/v$1.htm |
| Applicable "stated in"-value | Sogou Baike (Q11078338) |
Motivation[edit]
Just like the wikipedia, a large number of Chinese netizens are using Sogou Baike, which can effectively supplement the entities of wikidata and further provide open source dataset support for the construction of general knowledge graph.
Discussion[edit]
- This is a site similar to Baidu Baike, which we have four failed property proposals.--GZWDer (talk) 16:51, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- So, why did they ever fail? Is it because of lack of authority or user support? In fact, Baidu Baike and Sogou Baike have a large share of knowledge graphs in Chinese academia, such as CN-DBpedia. DavidMorre (talk) 00:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- @DavidMorre: You can read them for yourself: Wikidata:Property proposal/Baidu Baike ID, Wikidata:Property proposal/Baidu Baike ID (2), Wikidata:Property proposal/Baidu Baike LemmaID, @GZWDer: what's the fourth one? Mahir256 (talk) 01:46, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Wikidata:Property_proposal/Archive/34#Baidu Baike entry. GZWDer (talk) 16:46, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- @GZWDer: From the failed property proposals, copyvio and quality problems of Baidu Baike have led to a lot of controversy, and until a consensus is reached, seems like it would be a better idea to use the P973 first? DavidMorre (talk) 02:20, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Wikidata:Property_proposal/Archive/34#Baidu Baike entry. GZWDer (talk) 16:46, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- @DavidMorre: You can read them for yourself: Wikidata:Property proposal/Baidu Baike ID, Wikidata:Property proposal/Baidu Baike ID (2), Wikidata:Property proposal/Baidu Baike LemmaID, @GZWDer: what's the fourth one? Mahir256 (talk) 01:46, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- So, why did they ever fail? Is it because of lack of authority or user support? In fact, Baidu Baike and Sogou Baike have a large share of knowledge graphs in Chinese academia, such as CN-DBpedia. DavidMorre (talk) 00:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Not done no support for creation of this property --DannyS712 (talk) 01:08, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
