Wikidata:Property proposal/ScienceDirect topic ID

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

ScienceDirect topic ID[edit]

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

Descriptionidentifier for a topic on the research publication website ScienceDirect
RepresentsScienceDirect (Q2571518)
Data typeExternal identifier
Domainitem
Allowed values[a-z0-9\-]+/[a-z0-9\-]+
Example 1software resource (Q110832782)computer-science/software-resource
Example 2operating system (Q9135)computer-science/operating-system
Example 3virtual machine (Q192726)computer-science/virtual-machine
Example 4Cricetinae (Q6573)agricultural-and-biological-sciences/hamsters
Example 5LGBT (Q17884)psychology/lgbt
Example 6Hinduism (Q9089)earth-and-planetary-sciences/hinduism
Sourcehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/index
Number of IDs in source~365200 based on 100 topics per page and 3652 pages here
Expected completenessalways incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/$1
Distinct-values constraintyes
Wikidata projectWikiCite (Q21831105)

Motivation[edit]

ScienceDirect is a website that serves scientific research papers. It links various papers and their parts to machine-learning-derived topics that are then summarized on web pages.

An external ID would be useful for possibly exploring these topics for bibliographic purposes.

The Source MetaData WikiProject does not exist. Please correct the name.

Vladimir Alexiev Jonathan Groß Andy Mabbett Jneubert Sic19 Wikidelo ArthurPSmith PKM Ettorerizza Fuzheado Daniel Mietchen Iwan.Aucamp Epìdosis Sotho Tal Ker Bargioni Carlobia Pablo Busatto Matlin Msuicat Uomovariabile Silva Selva 1-Byte Alessandra.Moi CamelCaseNick Songceci moz AhavaCohen Kolja21 RShigapov Jason.nlw MasterRus21thCentury Newt713 Pierre Tribhou Powerek38 Ahatd JordanTimothyJames Silviafanti Back ache AfricanLibrarian M.roszkowski Rhagfyr 沈澄心 MrBenjo S.v.Mering

Notified participants of WikiProject Authority control

Lectrician1 (talk) 23:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

@So9q: It's Elsevier, they would never do that. They have opposed our other initiatives in the past. Bluerasberry (talk) 14:46, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]