Wikidata:Property proposal/Date of signature
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
date of signature[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Not done
| Description | MISSING |
|---|---|
| Represents | date of signature (Q100256464) |
| Data type | Point in time |
| Template parameter | "date_signed" in w:en:Template:Infobox legislation; "signature date" at w:en:Template:Infobox encyclical; "signature date" at w:en:Template:Infobox encyclical |
| Domain | property |
| Allowed values | date, hour |
| Allowed units | calendar date and hour |
| Example 1 | Treaty of Versailles (Q8736) → 28 June 1919 |
| Example 2 | Fratelli tutti (Q98918602) → 3 October 2020 |
| Example 3 | Law of Ukraine "On the Principles of the State Language Policy" (Q69103138) → 15 May 2019 |
| Source | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Ghent; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Versailles; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Versailles |
| Planned use | add the date of signing to treaties and other documents (e.g. papal encyclicals) |
| Expected completeness | eventually complete (Q21873974) |
Motivation[edit]
It seems to be important to be albe to know when a dcument was signed. Veverve (talk) 10:52, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Oppose why not simply use point in time (P585)? Or even better use the date it was signed by each party and combine point in time (P585) with qualifier signatory (P1891), similar to here. Some treaties/documents are not signed by all participants on the same date. --Hannes Röst (talk) 18:30, 10 October 2020 (UTC)- Oppose Using signatory (P1891) with either point in time (P585) or start time (P580) works better given that different signatories sign often on different dates. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 17:54, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose signatory (P1891) with point in time (P585) should be sufficient. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 06:00, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Not done @Veverve: please see suggested alternatives. --- Jura 10:04, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
